http://www.netuality.ro/memcached-vs-tugela-vs-memcachedb/presentations/20080317 Taming the big, bad, nasty websites Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:54:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.netuality.ro/memcached-vs-tugela-vs-memcachedb/presentations/20080317/comment-page-1#comment-607 KnightAR Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:52:42 +0000 http://www.netuality.ro/memcached-vs-tugela-vs-memcachedb/presentations/20080317#comment-607 1.2.0 was released on 11/24/2008 and 1.2.1-beta was released on 12/25/2008 ... Have you tired any of these yet? I've been wondering if they are stable enough to work as a secondary cache. IE. If Memcached doesn't have the cache it will resort to MemcacheDB, if MemcacheDB doesn't have it will grab it from the database and then set both Memcached and MemcacheDB. I'm looking to store data long term such as data that rarely changes but accessed often. 1.2.0 was released on 11/24/2008 and 1.2.1-beta was released on 12/25/2008 … Have you tired any of these yet? I’ve been wondering if they are stable enough to work as a secondary cache. IE. If Memcached doesn’t have the cache it will resort to MemcacheDB, if MemcacheDB doesn’t have it will grab it from the database and then set both Memcached and MemcacheDB. I’m looking to store data long term such as data that rarely changes but accessed often.

]]> http://www.netuality.ro/memcached-vs-tugela-vs-memcachedb/presentations/20080317/comment-page-1#comment-509 Clint Byrum Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:41:08 +0000 http://www.netuality.ro/memcached-vs-tugela-vs-memcachedb/presentations/20080317#comment-509 Definitely check out memcachedb v1.0.3. We've been using it with replication for 2 months now without problems. v1.1 is in beta now, and should bring the project to a nice place w.r.t. features and configurability. Definitely check out memcachedb v1.0.3. We’ve been using it with replication for 2 months now without problems. v1.1 is in beta now, and should bring the project to a nice place w.r.t. features and configurability.

]]>