<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTTP compression filter on servlets : good idea, wrong layer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netuality.ro/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/tools/20050202/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netuality.ro/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/tools/20050202</link>
	<description>Taming the big, bad, nasty websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.netuality.ro/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/tools/20050202/comment-page-1#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netoo.loco/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/uncategorized/20050202#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter, and thanks for reading my old dusty blog. The article was written in 2005, and indeed some things are to be taken with a grain of salt. I second what you said, modern servlet-based architectures have solved the problem in a better way.

However, note that the Apache solution is still doable if needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter, and thanks for reading my old dusty blog. The article was written in 2005, and indeed some things are to be taken with a grain of salt. I second what you said, modern servlet-based architectures have solved the problem in a better way.</p>
<p>However, note that the Apache solution is still doable if needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.netuality.ro/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/tools/20050202/comment-page-1#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netoo.loco/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/uncategorized/20050202#comment-624</guid>
		<description>The article is a bit misleading, as there is one flaw, you are making the assumption that the container is reverse proxying with an Apache front, a standalone servlet for instance cannot leverage those modules.

Fewer and fewer servlets are being configured this way, as more specialized and improved containers emerge, so no don&#039;t agree with this article entirely despite some good tips nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is a bit misleading, as there is one flaw, you are making the assumption that the container is reverse proxying with an Apache front, a standalone servlet for instance cannot leverage those modules.</p>
<p>Fewer and fewer servlets are being configured this way, as more specialized and improved containers emerge, so no don&#8217;t agree with this article entirely despite some good tips nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netuality &#187; SEO eye for the Tapestry guy</title>
		<link>http://www.netuality.ro/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/tools/20050202/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Netuality &#187; SEO eye for the Tapestry guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netoo.loco/http-compression-filter-on-servlets-good-idea-wrong-layer/uncategorized/20050202#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] with mod_rewrite in Apache. I do use Apache as a proxy server, in order to perform transparent and efficient gzip-ing on the fly.... Now, I only had to add the mod_rewrite filter and I&#8217;m ready to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with mod_rewrite in Apache. I do use Apache as a proxy server, in order to perform transparent and efficient gzip-ing on the fly&#8230;. Now, I only had to add the mod_rewrite filter and I&#8217;m ready to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
