Netuality

Yes, language propaganda again. Ain’t it fun ?

Here comes a nice quote from the latest Steve Yegge post (read it entirely if you have the time, it’s both fun and educational - at least for me). So, there:

I made the famously, horribly, career-shatteringly bad mistake of trying to use Ruby at Google, for this project. And I became, very quickly, I mean almost overnight, the Most Hated Person At Google. And, uh, and I’d have arguments with people about it, and they’d be like Nooooooo, WHAT IF… And ultimately, you know, ultimately they actually convinced me that they were right, in the sense that there actually were a few things. There were some taxes that I was imposing on the systems people, where they were gonna have to have some maintenance issues that they wouldn’t have. [...] But, you know, Google’s all about getting stuff done.

[...]

Is it allowed at Google to use Lisp and other languages?

No. No, it’s not OK. At Google you can use C++, Java, Python, JavaScript… I actually found a legal loophole and used server-side JavaScript for a project.

Mmmmm … key ?

Comments(6)

According to O’Reilly Radar, sales of Java books have declined in the last 4 years by almost 50%. C# is selling more books from year to year and will probably level up with Java in 2008. Javascript is on the rise (due to AJAX, for sure) and PHP is on a surprising decrease path (although the job statistics indicate quite the contrary).

In 2007, the number of sold Ruby books was larger than the number of Python books. In their article they qualify Ruby as being a “mid-major programming language” and Python as “mid-minor programming language”. However, after the announcement of Google App Engine the number of Python downloads from ActiveState has tripled in May. This should become visible in the book sales statistics, pretty soon.

Comments(8)

This presentation was planned for an older Wurbe event, but as this never quite happened in the last 4 months I am publishing it now, before it becomes totally obsolete.

My original contribution here is a comparison between the original memcached server from Danga and the tugela fork from the MediaWiki programmers. I’ve also tried memcachedb but the pre 1.0 version (from Google Code) in November 2007 was quite unstable and unpredictible.

In a nutshell, these memcache versions are using BerkeleyDB instead of memory slab allocator. There are 2 direct consequences:

• when the memory is large enough for the whole cache, database-backed servers will be slower (my tests shown 10-15% which might be tolerable - or not - for your app)
• when you’ve got lots of data to cache and your server’s memory is low, relying on bdb is significantly better than letting the swap mechanism to do its job (from my benchmarks, the difference can go up to 10 times faster especially under very high concurrency conditions)

Tugela will prove especially useful when running it on virtualized servers with very low memory.

My tests were performed with the “Tummy” Python client and Stackless for the multithreaded version. In one of the following weeks I’ll update the benchmarks for memcachedb 1.0.x - and I promise never ever to wait 4 months for a presentation, again …

Comments(1)

If you came here from the Mediafax article, this address is wrong. The Netuality you’re looking for is hosted by Hotnews.

Comments(0)

Wurbe is the informal web developers meeting group, from Bucharest Romania. Meeting #5 was focused on automated testing (unit, TDD, BDD, other stuff). This is my presentation:

Comments(3)